IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Gajewski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-07-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Powassan VooDoos NOJHL 23 5 7 12 0.522 0.0743 0.0743 0.2165 0.2165
2020-21 Willmar WarHawks NA3HL 26 14 12 26 1.000 0.1106 0.1106 0.3168 0.3168
2021-22 — NAHL 56 17 18 35 0.625 0.2220 0.2116 0.6562 0.6255
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Adrian ACHA_D1 — — 32 17 16 33 1.031
2024-25 Adrian ACHA_D1 — — 32 17 16 33 1.031
2023-24 Adrian ACHA_D1 — — 32 17 16 33 1.031
2022-23 Adrian ACHA_D1 — — 32 17 16 33 1.031
2021-22 Adrian ACHA_D1 — — 32 17 16 33 1.031
2020-21 Adrian ACHA_D1 — — 32 17 16 33 1.031

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26055
Forward overall
#1325
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neal Sheehan
Fredonia · 2003-04
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Liam Stirzinger
Aurora · 2015-16
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Logar
Buffalo State · 2017-18
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.