IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Parker Gnos Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-12-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Totino-Grace USHS-MN 27 4 18 22 0.815 0.2193 0.2193 0.1979 0.1979
2020-21 Totino-Grace USHS-MN 20 2 14 16 0.800 0.2154 0.2154 0.1943 0.1943
2021-22 Chippewa Steel NAHL 60 5 15 20 0.333 0.1238 0.1268 0.3529 0.3615
2022-23 Chippewa Steel NAHL 49 2 8 10 0.204 0.0758 0.0739 0.2161 0.2107
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Saint John's D3 MIAC JR 16 0 3 3 0.188
2024-25 Saint John's D3 MIAC SO 23 3 6 9 0.391
2023-24 Saint John's D3 MIAC FR 20 2 4 6 0.300
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2023-24 · Saint John's
+234.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
30%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9528
Defenseman overall
#1492
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Garret Peterson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ Army (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.16 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Scott Cremen
Canton · 2022-23
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Dauphinais
Wisconsin-Superior · 2021-22
0.263 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Tetzlaff
Curry · 2003-04
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.