IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Filip Wiberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-07-15 Country: Norway
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Västerås IK U20 SuperElit 10 0 1 1 0.100 0.0395 0.0395 0.1378 0.1378
2020-21 Skellefteå AIK U20 SuperElit 15 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Maine Nordiques NAHL 43 7 9 16 0.372 0.1367 0.1371 0.3933 0.3945
2022-23 Maine Nordiques NAHL 60 17 32 49 0.817 0.3001 0.2863 0.8632 0.8234
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA — 3 1 0 1 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2023-24 · Alaska Fairbanks
+71.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29316
Forward overall
#1727
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Soik
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2006-07
1.346 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bradley Becker
Utica · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Della Paolera
Anna Maria · 2021-22
0.850 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.