← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Coffey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-05-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 45 27 19 46 1.022 0.4168 0.4562 0.8216 0.8993
2018-19 Tri-City Storm USHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.1966 0.1976 1.0010 1.0062
2019-20 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 18 6 6 12 0.667 0.3933 0.3933 2.0024 2.0024
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Colorado College D1 NCHC SR 23 4 2 6 0.261
2023-24 Colorado College D1 NCHC JR 24 5 0 5 0.208
2022-23 Colorado College D1 NCHC SO 37 8 3 11 0.297
2021-22 Colorado College D1 NCHC FR 29 10 4 14 0.483
2020-21 Colorado College D1 NCHC 12 0 1 1 0.083
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2020-21 · Colorado College
-67.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5819
Forward overall
#241
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Army (0.91 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Boston University (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Norwich · 2007-08
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tufts · 2020-21
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2001-02
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.