IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Logan Nickerson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-05-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NAHL 43 5 2 7 0.163 0.0604 0.0631 0.1724 0.1800
2022-23 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NAHL 56 11 9 20 0.357 0.1326 0.1319 0.3781 0.3761
2023-24 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NAHL 56 12 13 25 0.446 0.1657 0.1569 0.4726 0.4475
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SO 14 2 1 3 0.214
2024-25 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC FR 16 4 0 4 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2024-25 · Wisconsin-Superior
+98.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
38%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31216
Forward overall
#1431
Forward born in 2003
#3779
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Louis DiMatteo
SUNY Cortland · 2016-17
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Devon Becker
Bryn Athyn · 2017-18
1.044 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jacob Erwin
Castleton · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.