IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jared Kaplowitz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-10-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Humboldt Broncos SJHL 20 1 8 9 0.450 0.1153 0.1164 0.3335 0.3368
2022-23 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 53 1 8 9 0.170 0.0603 0.0584 0.1783 0.1726
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lake Forest D3 NCHA GR 24 1 1 2 0.083
2024-25 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SR 20 0 5 5 0.250
2023-24 Lake Forest D3 NCHA JR 24 0 4 4 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2023-24 · Lake Forest
+116.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16707
Defenseman overall
#2945
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Skylar Christoffersen
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2005-06
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
James Devlin
Finlandia · 2013-14
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Graves
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2011-12
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.