IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Per Waage Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-06-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Wayzata USHS-MN 24 3 6 9 0.375 0.0462 0.0462 0.0911 0.0911
2020-21 Rochester Grizzlies NA3HL 18 0 3 3 0.167 0.0184 0.0184 0.0528 0.0528
2021-22 Austin Bruins NAHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 Rochester Grizzlies NA3HL 43 6 16 22 0.512 0.0566 0.0532 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Hamline D3 MIAC GR 14 1 0 1 0.071
2024-25 Hamline D3 MIAC SR 18 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Hamline D3 MIAC JR 22 0 2 2 0.091
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2023-24 · Hamline
+81.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17307
Defenseman overall
#3012
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kurri Woodford
Fredonia · 2017-18
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Stenberg
Connecticut College · 2022-23
0.191 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bobby Gertsakis
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.111 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.