IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kaleb Tiessen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-06-03 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Potomac Patriots USPHL-Premier 10 0 6 6 0.600 0.1978 0.1978 — —
2021-22 Burlington Cougars OJHL 50 6 24 30 0.600 0.1802 0.1752 0.4107 0.3992
2022-23 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 51 7 18 25 0.490 0.1942 0.1841 0.5147 0.4880
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC GR 5 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC SR 11 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC JR 6 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Donovan Hall
Neumann · 2004-05
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Corey Domenico
SUNY Oswego · 2009-10
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan Isley
Wisconsin-Superior · 2006-07
0.815 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.