← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Vockler Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 52 14 24 38 0.731 0.1872 0.1918 0.5509 0.5644
2022-23 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 40 13 31 44 1.100 0.2818 0.2746 0.8292 0.8081
2023-24 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 53 22 51 73 1.377 0.3529 0.3271 1.0383 0.9624
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Arizona ACHA_D1 26 17 17 34 1.308
2024-25 University of Arizona ACHA_D1 26 17 17 34 1.308
2023-24 University of Arizona ACHA_D1 26 17 17 34 1.308
2022-23 University of Arizona ACHA_D1 26 17 17 34 1.308
2021-22 University of Arizona ACHA_D1 26 17 17 34 1.308
2020-21 University of Arizona ACHA_D1 26 17 17 34 1.308

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12265
Forward overall
#571
Forward born in 2003
#61
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2012-13
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2011-12
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Olaf · 2013-14
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.