← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matthew Croxall Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-02-23 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Holy Cross
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 39 14 15 29 0.744 0.2732 0.2969 0.7849 0.8530
2024-25 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 27 5 7 12 0.444 0.1633 0.1689 0.4691 0.4852
2025-26 Blackfalds Bulldogs BCHL 51 16 13 29 0.569 0.2191 0.2148 0.8275 0.8111
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27656
Forward overall
#1387
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

Holy Cross Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2018-19
0.18
actual FR PPG at Holy Cross
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.93
actual FR PPG at Holy Cross
AJHL 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Holy Cross
BCHL 2016-17
0.12
actual FR PPG at Holy Cross

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2011-12
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Johnson & Wales · 2014-15
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2016-17
0.550 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.