← New Search ↗ Social Card

Christian Maro Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-08-04 Country: USA
Holy Cross
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Exeter NE-Prep 28 11 16 27 0.964 0.1910 0.1910 0.4393 0.4393
2022-23 Exeter NE-Prep 28 10 16 26 0.929 0.1840 0.1840 0.4231 0.4231
2023-24 Powell River Kings BCHL 53 15 24 39 0.736 0.2835 0.2947 1.0708 1.1131
2024-25 Chicoutimi Saguenéens QMJHL 10 0 0 0 0.000
2025-26 BCHL 49 17 22 39 0.796 0.3067 0.2921 1.1583 1.1032
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31301
Forward overall
#1865
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Holy Cross Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2019-20
0.15
actual FR PPG at Holy Cross
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.12
actual FR PPG at Holy Cross
BCHL 2023-24
0.18
actual FR PPG at Holy Cross
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.33
actual FR PPG at Holy Cross

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2008-09
0.920 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2014-15
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.