IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alexios Georgaklis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-01-09 Country: USA
Connecticut College
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 44 4 2 6 0.136 0.0526 0.0556 0.1984 0.2097
2023-24 — NAHL 50 9 16 25 0.500 0.1837 0.1893 0.5284 0.5446
2024-25 Wisconsin Windigo NAHL 54 15 21 36 0.667 0.2449 0.2395 0.7046 0.6892
2025-26 Wisconsin Windigo NAHL 59 17 30 47 0.797 0.2927 0.2719 0.8419 0.7820
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18746
Forward overall
#995
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Connecticut College Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Ryan McKenna
0.79
actual FR PPG at Connecticut College
Joe Birmingham
0.77
actual FR PPG at Connecticut College
Michael Paul Capozzi
0.78
actual FR PPG at Connecticut College
Arthur Mirante
0.52
actual FR PPG at Connecticut College

D2/3 Comparables

Caden Pendo
Chatham · 2024-25
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Chase Nieuwendyk
SUNY Brockport · 2011-12
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Zappia
SUNY Cortland · 2010-11
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.