IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Billy Sheridan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-03-26 Country: USA
Neumann
MAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 53 8 16 24 0.453 0.1664 0.1732 0.4786 0.4982
2024-25 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 59 12 31 43 0.729 0.2678 0.2647 0.7703 0.7615
2025-26 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 46 10 23 33 0.717 0.2636 0.2476 0.7582 0.7122
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19974
Forward overall
#1061
Forward born in 2005
#1300
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

Neumann Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jory Mullin
0.61
actual FR PPG at Neumann
Shayne Morrissey
0.88
actual FR PPG at Neumann
Zach Smith
0.96
actual FR PPG at Neumann
Zac Boyle
0.39
actual FR PPG at Neumann

D2/3 Comparables

Hunter Hayes
St. Olaf · 2024-25
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Glenn Wiswell
Castleton · 2016-17
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Gage Christianson
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2012-13
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.