IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tanner Anctil Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-09-24 Country: USA
Southern Maine
LittleEast D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 North Yarmouth NE-Prep 33 3 6 9 0.273 0.0548 0.0548 0.1247 0.1247
2023-24 New Hampshire Mountain Kings NAHL 21 2 7 9 0.429 0.1575 0.1679 0.4530 0.4829
2024-25 New Hampshire Mountain Kings NAHL 58 3 8 11 0.190 0.0697 0.0706 0.2005 0.2032
2025-26 New Hampshire Mountain Kings NAHL 48 7 6 13 0.271 0.0995 0.0959 0.2862 0.2760
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#44621
Forward overall
#2900
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Southern Maine Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Tyler Gardiner
0.42
actual FR PPG at Southern Maine
Isaac Grondin
0.33
actual FR PPG at Southern Maine
Jakub Suran
0.33
actual FR PPG at Southern Maine
Mark Tomaschek
0.00
actual FR PPG at Southern Maine

D2/3 Comparables

Juraj Elias
University of New England · 2021-22
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Liam Blais
Wisconsin-Superior · 2015-16
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Johnson
Hamline · 2005-06
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.