← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Hanscom Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-01-25 Country: USA
Colby
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Westminster NE-Prep 25 1 4 5 0.200 0.0396 0.0396 0.0911 0.0911
2022-23 Westminster NE-Prep 26 5 8 13 0.500 0.0990 0.0990 0.2278 0.2278
2023-24 New Hampshire Mountain Kings NAHL 18 1 2 3 0.167 0.0612 0.0632 0.1760 0.1818
2024-25 NAHL 22 1 2 3 0.136 0.0501 0.0491 0.1440 0.1412
2025-26 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 54 1 12 13 0.241 0.0884 0.0823 0.2541 0.2366
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21014
Defenseman overall
#3569
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Colby Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.24
actual FR PPG at Colby
0.33
actual FR PPG at Colby
0.42
actual FR PPG at Colby
0.38
actual FR PPG at Colby

D2/3 Comparables

Hamilton · 2016-17
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connecticut College · 2023-24
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2018-19
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.