IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lachlan Haeger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-04-17 Country: USA
Wentworth
CNE D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 New Jersey Jr. Titans NA3HL 6 1 1 2 0.333 0.0418 0.0451 0.1052 0.1135
2023-24 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 26 1 2 3 0.115 0.0424 0.0420 0.1218 0.1208
2025-26 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 44 0 3 3 0.068 0.0251 0.0237 0.0720 0.0678
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#60713
Forward overall
#4363
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Wentworth Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Nick Ramm
0.22
actual FR PPG at Wentworth
Tyler Lapshanski
0.19
actual FR PPG at Wentworth
Jonathan Spada
0.27
actual FR PPG at Wentworth
Benjamin Iwanowski
0.24
actual FR PPG at Wentworth

D2/3 Comparables

Tim Perron
Plymouth State · 2014-15
0.263 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Vannier
Wesleyan · 2015-16
0.154 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nolan Underwood
Fredonia · 2022-23
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.