IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Earl Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-08-19 Country: USA
Lindenwood
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 54 23 18 41 0.759 0.2790 0.2814 0.8014 0.8082
2025-26 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 58 30 37 67 1.155 0.4244 0.4071 1.2193 1.1697
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9270
Forward overall
#380
Forward born in 2005
#201
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Lindenwood Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jacob Fletcher
BCHL 2024-25
0.89
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Louis-Philippe Fontaine
QMJHL 2024-25
0.70
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Cade DeStefani
NAHL 2021-22
0.58
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Ty Hipkin
AJHL 2023-24
0.25
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood

D2/3 Comparables

Braydon Beahm
St. Norbert · 2024-25
0.968 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Herdt
Concordia · 2015-16
1.273 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Dakota Dubetz
Marian · 2008-09
1.333 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.