IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Richard Rucireto Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-03-17 Country: USA
SUNY Oswego
Verbal SUNYAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Northeast Generals NAHL 59 29 39 68 1.153 0.4234 0.4180 1.2165 1.2010
2025-26 — BCHL 31 7 9 16 0.516 0.1989 0.1856 0.7511 0.7010
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9361
Forward overall
#387
Forward born in 2005
#207
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

SUNY Oswego Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Peter Rodrigues
0.00
actual FR PPG at SUNY Oswego
Tyler Leimbrock
0.52
actual FR PPG at SUNY Oswego
Brian Hennessey
0.00
actual FR PPG at SUNY Oswego
Manny Gialedakis
0.75
actual FR PPG at SUNY Oswego

D2/3 Comparables

Danny Bosio
SUNY Geneseo · 2016-17
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Steven Sleep
St. Norbert · 2004-05
0.516 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Hayes
St. Olaf · 2024-25
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.