← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sloan Farmer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-06-02 Country: USA
Williams
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Brunswick NE-Prep 28 5 10 15 0.536 0.1061 0.1061 0.2441 0.2441
2022-23 Brunswick NE-Prep 29 1 2 3 0.103 0.0205 0.0205 0.0471 0.0471
2023-24 Connecticut Jr. Rangers NCDC 30 0 4 4 0.133 0.0543 0.0567 0.1071 0.1119
2024-25 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 54 6 19 25 0.463 0.1701 0.1697 0.4887 0.4876
2025-26 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 50 0 18 18 0.360 0.1323 0.1255 0.3800 0.3605
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11439
Defenseman overall
#2360
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Williams Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.50
actual FR PPG at Williams
0.75
actual FR PPG at Williams
0.36
actual FR PPG at Williams
0.56
actual FR PPG at Williams

D2/3 Comparables

Post · 2024-25
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
King's · 2023-24
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2018-19
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.