IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dmitrijs Dilevka Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-10-13 Country: Latvia
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Stonehill
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Watertown Shamrocks NAHL 51 6 17 23 0.451 0.1657 0.1766 0.4760 0.5074
2025-26 Brooks Bandits BCHL 40 13 19 32 0.800 0.3082 0.3119 1.1642 1.1781
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21437
Forward overall
#964
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

Judd Peterson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Fossen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Grant Opperman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Villiam Haag
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

Stonehill Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Justin Barker
AJHL 2021-22
0.29
actual FR PPG at Stonehill
Cam Collins
EHL 2021-22
0.57
actual FR PPG at Stonehill
Zachary Aben
NAHL 2022-23
0.37
actual FR PPG at Stonehill
Austin Pick
EHL 2020-21
0.20
actual FR PPG at Stonehill

D2/3 Comparables

Alessio Luciani
Adrian · 2017-18
1.103 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jakob Breault
Utica · 2018-19
1.044 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Miller
St. Scholastica · 2007-08
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.