| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | Janesville Jets | NAHL | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0.500 | 0.1981 | 0.2181 | 0.5250 | 0.5781 |
| 2019-20 | — | USHL | 43 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 0.442 | 0.2716 | 0.2716 | 1.3019 | 1.3019 |
| 2020-21 | Sioux City Musketeers | USHL | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2021-22 | Janesville Jets | NAHL | 58 | 13 | 26 | 39 | 0.672 | 0.2664 | 0.2539 | 0.7060 | 0.6730 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Colgate | D1 | ECAC | SR | 36 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 0.194 |
| 2024-25 | Colgate | D1 | ECAC | — | 25 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 0.360 |
| 2023-24 | Colgate | D1 | ECAC | — | 36 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0.083 |
| 2022-23 | Wisconsin | D1 | BigTen | — | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.143 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.