← New Search ↗ Social Card

Robby Newton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-07-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Janesville Jets NAHL 6 2 1 3 0.500 0.1981 0.2181 0.5250 0.5781
2019-20 USHL 43 9 10 19 0.442 0.2716 0.2716 1.3019 1.3019
2020-21 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 15 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Janesville Jets NAHL 58 13 26 39 0.672 0.2664 0.2539 0.7060 0.6730
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Colgate D1 ECAC SR 36 4 3 7 0.194
2024-25 Colgate D1 ECAC 25 3 6 9 0.360
2023-24 Colgate D1 ECAC 36 2 1 3 0.083
2022-23 Wisconsin D1 BigTen 7 0 1 1 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2022-23 · Wisconsin
-30.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31890
Forward overall
#1693
Forward born in 2001
#3016
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Marian · 2006-07
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2017-18
0.619 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2011-12
0.815 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.