← New Search ↗ Social Card

Parker Osborn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-04-06 Country: USA
Salve Regina
CNE D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Holy Family USHS-MN 17 5 2 7 0.412 0.0521 0.0521 0.1000 0.1000
2021-22 Holy Family USHS-MN 26 25 19 44 1.692 0.2142 0.2142 0.4111 0.4111
2022-23 Holy Family USHS-MN 26 29 40 69 2.654 0.3360 0.3360 0.6446 0.6446
2023-24 Ogden Mustangs NCDC 51 38 28 66 1.294 0.5276 0.5473 1.0402 1.0790
2024-25 North Iowa Bulls NAHL 44 10 10 20 0.455 0.1670 0.1653 0.4797 0.4749
2025-26 Houston Bulls NAHL 29 6 16 22 0.759 0.2787 0.2622 0.8007 0.7533
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10474
Forward overall
#465
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

Salve Regina Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

1.38
actual FR PPG at Salve Regina
0.96
actual FR PPG at Salve Regina
0.65
actual FR PPG at Salve Regina
1.16
actual FR PPG at Salve Regina

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Morrisville · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2016-17
0.781 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Potsdam · 2000-01
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.