IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jackson Rutherford Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-04-07 Country: Canada
Stevenson
MAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 North York Rangers OJHL 50 0 3 3 0.060 0.0147 0.0156 0.0413 0.0439
2023-24 Oakville Blades OJHL 33 0 4 4 0.121 0.0297 0.0300 0.0834 0.0843
2024-25 Northeast Generals NAHL 44 2 15 17 0.386 0.1420 0.1406 0.4078 0.4038
2025-26 Northeast Generals NAHL 49 2 14 16 0.327 0.1200 0.1129 0.3446 0.3242
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14582
Defenseman overall
#2802
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Stevenson Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Ryan Arendes
0.23
actual FR PPG at Stevenson
Dominic Brenza
0.46
actual FR PPG at Stevenson
Christopher Lee
0.58
actual FR PPG at Stevenson
Ryan Patrick
0.60
actual FR PPG at Stevenson

D2/3 Comparables

Truman Landowski
Hamilton · 2012-13
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cullen Hennessy
Johnson & Wales · 2023-24
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lionel Mauron
Curry · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.