← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sean Smith Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-04-10 Country: USA
University of New England
CNE D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 St. Paul Johnson USHS-MN 26 1 14 15 0.577 0.0730 0.0730 0.1401 0.1401
2020-21 St. Paul Johnson USHS-MN 18 1 6 7 0.389 0.0492 0.0492 0.0944 0.0944
2023-24 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 34 1 6 7 0.206 0.0691 0.0706 0.1905 0.1946
2024-25 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 59 2 15 17 0.288 0.1058 0.1048 0.3045 0.3016
2025-26 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 57 10 31 41 0.719 0.2643 0.2488 0.7602 0.7156
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8042
Defenseman overall
#1850
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

University of New England Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.42
actual FR PPG at University of New England
0.50
actual FR PPG at University of New England
0.64
actual FR PPG at University of New England
0.96
actual FR PPG at University of New England

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Anselm · 2017-18
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2013-14
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2011-12
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.