← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Fiedorczuk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-06-23 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Hamilton
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Kent School NE-Prep 25 3 4 7 0.280 0.0555 0.0555 0.1276 0.1276
2023-24 Kent School NE-Prep 26 16 11 27 1.038 0.2057 0.2057 0.4731 0.4731
2024-25 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 44 8 6 14 0.318 0.1169 0.1228 0.3359 0.3529
2025-26 Surrey Eagles BCHL 31 7 6 13 0.419 0.1616 0.1611 0.6104 0.6084
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28272
Forward overall
#1434
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Hamilton Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.73
actual FR PPG at Hamilton
0.89
actual FR PPG at Hamilton
0.58
actual FR PPG at Hamilton
0.96
actual FR PPG at Hamilton

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2008-09
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2023-24
0.690 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2018-19
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.