IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Boring Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-10-30 Country: USA
SUNY Plattsburgh
SUNYAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Northern Cyclones NCDC 23 2 8 10 0.435 0.1773 0.1889 0.3495 0.3724
2024-25 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NAHL 27 6 4 10 0.370 0.1361 0.1386 0.3910 0.3982
2025-26 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NAHL 50 10 11 21 0.420 0.1543 0.1495 0.4433 0.4296
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30796
Forward overall
#1827
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

SUNY Plattsburgh Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Kevin Galan
0.84
actual FR PPG at SUNY Plattsburgh
Zach Blake
0.50
actual FR PPG at SUNY Plattsburgh
Gabriel Filion
0.58
actual FR PPG at SUNY Plattsburgh
Blair Falotico
0.00
actual FR PPG at SUNY Plattsburgh

D2/3 Comparables

Parker Williams
Concordia (WI) · 2021-22
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dan Swanson
Concordia · 2005-06
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Love
New England College · 2022-23
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.