IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Schooley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-08-19 Country: USA
St. John Fisher
UCHC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 — NAHL 44 2 1 3 0.068 0.0251 0.0253 0.0720 0.0726
2025-26 — NAHL 41 4 5 9 0.220 0.0806 0.0773 0.2317 0.2223
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#54848
Forward overall
#3830
Forward born in 2005
#6347
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

St. John Fisher Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Gianpaolo Giamartino
0.00
actual FR PPG at St. John Fisher
Michael Markowski
0.24
actual FR PPG at St. John Fisher
Gavin Brandon
0.20
actual FR PPG at St. John Fisher
Ian Duffy
0.20
actual FR PPG at St. John Fisher

D2/3 Comparables

Curtis Judd
Southern Maine · 2018-19
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Watson
Adrian · 2006-07
0.552 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Zach Kozak
Lake Forest · 2007-08
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.