← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Mottau Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-07-15 Country: USA
Connecticut College
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Thayer Academy NE-Prep 25 0 3 3 0.120 0.0238 0.0238 0.0547 0.0547
2023-24 Thayer Academy NE-Prep 23 7 3 10 0.435 0.0861 0.0861 0.1981 0.1981
2024-25 Surrey Eagles BCHL 28 3 9 12 0.429 0.1651 0.1629 0.6237 0.6153
2025-26 Wisconsin Windigo NAHL 48 13 10 23 0.479 0.1761 0.1681 0.5058 0.4828
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#36898
Forward overall
#2278
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Connecticut College Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.64
actual FR PPG at Connecticut College
0.52
actual FR PPG at Connecticut College
0.59
actual FR PPG at Connecticut College
0.87
actual FR PPG at Connecticut College

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2024-25
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2013-14
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2012-13
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.