← New Search ↗ Social Card

Landon Stringfellow Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-05-10 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Lindenwood
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Andover USHS-MN 28 1 6 7 0.250 0.0316 0.0316 0.0607 0.0607
2022-23 Andover USHS-MN 23 4 7 11 0.478 0.0606 0.0606 0.1162 0.1162
2023-24 Andover USHS-MN 22 4 9 13 0.591 0.0748 0.0748 0.1435 0.1435
2024-25 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13136
Defenseman overall
#2449
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Lindenwood Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2021-22
0.33
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
AJHL 2022-23
0.21
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
NAHL 2022-23
0.29
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
CCHL 2021-22
0.50
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Anselm · 2022-23
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2015-16
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2011-12
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.