IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Jimenez Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-05-24 Country: USA
Arcadia
MAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Provo Predators USPHL-Premier 9 0 1 1 0.111 0.0145 0.0157 0.0377 0.0409
2023-24 Wisconsin Rapids Riverkings USPHL-Premier 34 1 0 1 0.029 0.0038 0.0039 0.0100 0.0104
2024-25 — NA3HL 34 0 5 5 0.147 0.0185 0.0182 — —
2025-26 Rochester Jr. Americans NAHL 6 0 1 1 0.167 0.0612 0.0580 0.1760 0.1667
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22763
Defenseman overall
#3751
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Arcadia Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Connor Williams
0.38
actual FR PPG at Arcadia
T.J. Haas
0.17
actual FR PPG at Arcadia
Jared Shuter
0.30
actual FR PPG at Arcadia
Nathaniel McFarlane
0.22
actual FR PPG at Arcadia

D2/3 Comparables

McKenzie Gray
Neumann · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Emmett McHardy
Castleton · 2023-24
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Grady Friedman
UMass Boston · 2021-22
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.