IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aaron Bleier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-02-24 Country: USA
Wentworth
CNE D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Connecticut Jr. Rangers USPHL-Premier 43 10 29 39 0.907 0.1186 0.1273 0.3078 0.3304
2023-24 Connecticut Jr. Rangers NCDC 35 7 7 14 0.400 0.1631 0.1683 0.3215 0.3317
2024-25 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NAHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2025-26 — NAHL 45 2 2 4 0.089 0.0327 0.0306 0.0938 0.0877
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#43669
Forward overall
#2847
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

Wentworth Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Joseph Mottiqua
0.32
actual FR PPG at Wentworth
Michael Heffner
0.31
actual FR PPG at Wentworth
Nick Ramm
0.22
actual FR PPG at Wentworth
Benjamin Iwanowski
0.24
actual FR PPG at Wentworth

D2/3 Comparables

Mitch Snyder
St. Norbert · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Vito Aluia
Lake Forest · 2014-15
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Pfister
Wisconsin-Stout · 2023-24
0.316 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.