← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan McFadden Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-01-06 Country: Canada
Niagara
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Milton Menace OJHL 47 7 11 18 0.383 0.0939 0.0987 0.2637 0.2771
2023-24 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 56 23 35 58 1.036 0.2539 0.2536 0.7131 0.7122
2024-25 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 50 24 26 50 1.000 0.2451 0.2322 0.6885 0.6522
2025-26 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 37 13 15 28 0.757 0.2780 0.2581 0.7988 0.7417
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15687
Forward overall
#812
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Niagara Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

WHL 2024-25
0.57
actual FR PPG at Niagara
NAHL 2021-22
0.09
actual FR PPG at Niagara
AJHL 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Niagara
OJHL 2018-19
0.17
actual FR PPG at Niagara

D2/3 Comparables

Framingham State · 2008-09
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Albertus Magnus · 2024-25
0.706 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2001-02
0.536 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.