IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Van Martin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-10-03 Country: USA
St. Lawrence
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 — NAHL 45 13 14 27 0.600 0.2204 0.2348 0.6341 0.6756
2026-27 Vernon Vipers BCHL 6 1 3 4 0.667 0.2569 0.2569 0.9696 0.9696
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22899
Forward overall
#747
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Judd Peterson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Reuschlein
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Fossen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Grant Opperman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG

St. Lawrence Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Sam LeDrew
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.56
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
Cayden Casey
NAHL 2023-24
0.31
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
Gabriel Westling
NAHL 2022-23
0.30
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
Isaac Tremblay
BCHL 2023-24
0.36
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence

D2/3 Comparables

Mitchell Herlihey
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
George Kolovos
Wentworth · 2022-23
0.824 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Ryan
SUNY Oswego · 2022-23
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.