IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Van Martin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-10-03 Country: USA
St. Lawrence
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 — NAHL 45 13 14 27 0.600 0.2204 0.2348 0.6333 0.6747
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22507
Forward overall
#708
Forward born in 2007
#1649
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mitch Hults
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jake Horton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Zach Aston-Reese
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG

St. Lawrence Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Sam LeDrew
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.56
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
Cayden Casey
USHL 2022-23
0.31
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
Spencer Bell
AJHL 2021-22
0.12
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
Gabriel Westling
SHL-J20 2021-22
0.30
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence

D2/3 Comparables

Joey Schaefer
Nazareth · 2018-19
0.733 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Stevens
Middlebury · 2023-24
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jonah Alexander
Hobart · 2017-18
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.