IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Avry Shaw Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-03-29 Country: USA
Norwich
LittleEast D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Kemptville 73's CCHL 54 2 9 11 0.204 0.0442 0.0449 0.1576 0.1603
2024-25 Kemptville 73's CCHL 54 5 16 21 0.389 0.0844 0.0820 0.3009 0.2924
2025-26 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 58 11 15 26 0.448 0.1647 0.1548 0.4732 0.4447
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12293
Defenseman overall
#2485
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Norwich Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Rick Cleaver
1.24
actual FR PPG at Norwich
Todd Jackson
0.38
actual FR PPG at Norwich
Carter Cowlthorp
0.58
actual FR PPG at Norwich
Philip Elgstam
0.41
actual FR PPG at Norwich

D2/3 Comparables

Patrick Wyers
Gustavus Adolphus · 2021-22
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jacob Erwin
Castleton · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Bennett Weycker
SUNY Morrisville · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.