← New Search ↗ Social Card

Samuel Lussier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-07-04 Country: Canada
Alaska Fairbanks
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Universel Collège Gatineau USPHL-Premier 16 4 4 8 0.500 0.0656 0.0750 0.1698 0.1941
2024-25 Utica Jr. Comets NCDC 53 20 19 39 0.736 0.3000 0.3315 0.5888 0.6506
2025-26 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 43 11 14 25 0.581 0.2136 0.2249 0.6145 0.6470
2026-27 Brooks Bandits BCHL 5 0 2 2 0.400 0.1541 0.1541 0.5818 0.5818
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17812
Forward overall
#537
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG

Alaska Fairbanks Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2021-22
0.89
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.40
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
NAHL 2021-22
0.33
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
USHL 2012-13
0.14
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks

D2/3 Comparables

Connecticut College · 2006-07
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2021-22
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern Maine · 2004-05
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.