IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Liam Wolf-Taulbee Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-01-12 Country: USA
Trine
NCHA D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 58 9 16 25 0.431 0.1583 0.1471 0.4555 0.4233
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
32%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33197
Forward overall
#1970
Forward born in 2005
#3197
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Trine Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Sammy Nardicchio
0.50
actual FR PPG at Trine
Alexander Babich
0.80
actual FR PPG at Trine
Carmine Taffo
0.26
actual FR PPG at Trine
Gianni Vitali
0.52
actual FR PPG at Trine

D2/3 Comparables

Brock Krulicki
SUNY Oswego · 2022-23
0.450 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Niko Happo
Manhattanville · 2017-18
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tal Halliday
Concordia · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.