IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Marc-Alexandre Richard Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-05-23 Country: Canada
Alvernia
MAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Connecticut Jr. Rangers NCDC 43 2 4 6 0.140 0.0569 0.0594 0.1116 0.1165
2024-25 Connecticut Jr. Rangers NCDC 53 11 18 29 0.547 0.2231 0.2229 0.4379 0.4376
2025-26 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 55 7 9 16 0.291 0.1069 0.1013 0.3075 0.2913
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8490
Defenseman overall
#1920
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Alvernia Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Vinny Servizzi
0.22
actual FR PPG at Alvernia
Ryan Parent
0.00
actual FR PPG at Alvernia
Kyle Patton
0.25
actual FR PPG at Alvernia
Brock Mueller
0.50
actual FR PPG at Alvernia

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Covach
Plymouth State · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
John Nugent
Lake Forest · 2014-15
0.235 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ethan Homitz
SUNY Cortland · 2017-18
0.278 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.