← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Ciaramitaro Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-04-05 Country: Canada
SUNY Cortland
SUNYAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Leamington Flyers OJHL 54 11 23 34 0.630 0.1543 0.1560 0.4335 0.4382
2024-25 Leamington Flyers OJHL 54 9 25 34 0.630 0.1543 0.1480 0.4335 0.4159
2025-26 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 56 6 8 14 0.250 0.0919 0.0864 0.2639 0.2482
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10932
Defenseman overall
#2291
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

SUNY Cortland Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.26
actual FR PPG at SUNY Cortland
0.00
actual FR PPG at SUNY Cortland
0.63
actual FR PPG at SUNY Cortland
0.24
actual FR PPG at SUNY Cortland

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2012-13
0.393 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Suffolk · 2001-02
1.308 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nazareth · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.