← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Osborn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-02-12 Country: USA
Alaska Fairbanks
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 40 5 3 8 0.200 0.0735 0.0796 0.2114 0.2290
2026-27 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 7 1 0 1 0.143 0.0525 0.0552 0.1510 0.1587
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
60%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#51664
Forward overall
#1195
Forward born in 2008
#5991
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Alaska Fairbanks Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2019-20
0.50
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
MJHL 2021-22
0.10
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
NAHL 2018-19
0.33
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
USHL 2021-22
0.11
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks

D2/3 Comparables

King's · 2018-19
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tufts · 2013-14
0.111 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2021-22
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.