IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Osborn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-02-12 Country: USA
Alaska Fairbanks
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 40 5 3 8 0.200 0.0735 0.0796 0.2111 0.2287
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
62%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#51102
Forward overall
#1076
Forward born in 2008
#5858
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Jason Cotton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Félix Caron
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ RPI (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Eastman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bryan Basilico
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joe Widmar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ UMass (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Alaska Fairbanks Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

William Lawson-Body
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.50
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
Trenton Penner
MJHL 2020-21
0.10
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
Alexander Malinowski
SuperElit 2018-19
0.57
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
Beau Courtney
WHL 2021-22
0.14
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks

D2/3 Comparables

Adam Young
Manhattanville · 2006-07
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Rob Sheehan
King's · 2017-18
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Way
Concordia · 2015-16
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.