IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joshua Bostedo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-10-15 Country: USA
Army
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 — NAHL 22 3 3 6 0.273 0.1002 0.1119 0.2878 0.3215
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
65%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#44780
Forward overall
#862
Forward born in 2008
#4980
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Jack Billings
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Niagara
0.16 No data
NCAAe PPG
Blake Christensen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ American International (0.64 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Sheehy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Connor Hurley
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Biagio Lerario
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Army Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Adam Marshall
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.32
actual FR PPG at Army
Brock Jones
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.08
actual FR PPG at Army
Reese Farrell
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.25
actual FR PPG at Army
Stephen Willey
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.17
actual FR PPG at Army

D2/3 Comparables

Dylan Schuett
University of New England · 2017-18
0.238 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Jacobs
Neumann · 2002-03
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chandler Madry
Augsburg · 2012-13
0.966 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.