IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Daniel Hussa Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-05-06 Country: USA
Vermont
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 4 1 0 1 0.250 0.1019 0.1163 0.2001 0.2284
2024-25 Blackfalds Bulldogs BCHL 21 4 2 6 0.286 0.1101 0.1186 0.4155 0.4474
2025-26 Blackfalds Bulldogs BCHL 43 14 11 25 0.581 0.2240 0.2330 0.8456 0.8794
2026-27 Fargo Force USHL 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.1475 0.1475 0.7502 0.7502
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33602
Forward overall
#1282
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

Vermont Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Blake Steenerson
USHS-MN 2022-23
0.41
actual FR PPG at Vermont
Martin Fréchette
CCHL 2016-17
0.00
actual FR PPG at Vermont
Daniel Sambuco
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.08
actual FR PPG at Vermont
Max Strand
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.67
actual FR PPG at Vermont

D2/3 Comparables

Aaron Leonard
Marian · 2009-10
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Manning
Worcester State · 2015-16
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Kennedy
Wentworth · 2014-15
0.706 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.