IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Martin Fréchette Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-05-04 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Univ. of Ottawa · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Navan Grads CCHL 42 10 6 16 0.381 0.0826 0.0921 0.2918 0.3253
2014-15 Navan Grads CCHL 59 9 23 32 0.542 0.1176 0.1257 0.4155 0.4441
2015-16 Navan Grads CCHL 59 36 35 71 1.203 0.2610 0.2663 0.9218 0.9407
2016-17 Navan Grads CCHL 59 20 41 61 1.034 0.2243 0.2171 0.7920 0.7666
2019-20 Univ. of Ottawa USports-M 5 0 2 2 0.400 0.2110 0.2110 1.1721 1.1721
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Vermont D1 HockeyEast — 21 1 2 3 0.143
2017-18 Vermont D1 HockeyEast — 2 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#15348
Forward overall
#694
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Taylor Bommarito
Manhattanville · 2015-16
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Davis
Neumann · 2012-13
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ian Ecklund
Wisconsin-Superior · 2012-13
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.