IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jakob Hansen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-03-09 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Lake Forest
NCHA D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Chippewa Steel NAHL 15 0 2 2 0.133 0.0490 0.0484 0.1407 0.1389
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16341
Defenseman overall
#2857
Defenseman born in 2006
#5151
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Lake Forest Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Mark DerManulian
0.19
actual FR PPG at Lake Forest
Scott Douglas
0.18
actual FR PPG at Lake Forest
Matt Williams
0.00
actual FR PPG at Lake Forest
Zachary Feldman
0.50
actual FR PPG at Lake Forest

D2/3 Comparables

Nicholas Alfieri
SUNY Potsdam · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Brock Mueller
Alvernia · 2022-23
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Ayotte
SUNY Oswego · 2007-08
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.