IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrius Kulbis-Marino Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-02-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Albany Academy NE-Prep 27 6 8 14 0.518 0.1027 0.1027 0.2362 0.2362
2019-20 Tri-City Storm USHL 32 0 5 5 0.156 0.0921 0.0921 0.4691 0.4691
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Long Island Univ. D1 AHA — 34 3 7 10 0.294
2023-24 Sacred Heart D1 AHA GR 36 5 5 10 0.278
2022-23 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SR 13 0 1 1 0.077
2021-22 Sacred Heart D1 AHA JR 35 6 10 16 0.457
2020-21 Sacred Heart D1 AHA — 12 0 1 1 0.083
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2020-21 · Sacred Heart
-14.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
95%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14549
Defenseman overall
#2399
Defenseman born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Ruslan Pedan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Lukas Buchta
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mitch Dillon
Bowdoin · 2003-04
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dante Zapata
Utica · 2016-17
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Oberg
Salem State · 2016-17
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.