IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jared Scott Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-01-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.1475 0.1475 0.7366 0.7366
2020-21 Janesville Jets NAHL 5 1 1 2 0.400 0.1421 0.1421 0.4200 0.4200
2021-22 Northeast Generals NAHL 53 19 20 39 0.736 0.2614 0.2557 0.7725 0.7557
2022-23 Northeast Generals NAHL 57 9 14 23 0.404 0.1433 0.1332 0.4236 0.3936
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC JR 23 7 5 12 0.522
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2025-26 · St. Scholastica
+234.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26019
Forward overall
#1472
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kaden Milles
Beloit · 2024-25
0.381 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cody Symonds
Buffalo State · 2016-17
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Eli Lynn
Becker · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.