IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Miles Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-12-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Omaha Lancers USHL 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 45 5 15 20 0.444 0.1761 0.1761 0.4666 0.4666
2021-22 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 52 6 11 17 0.327 0.1295 0.1261 0.3432 0.3342
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Union D1 ECAC — 10 1 0 1 0.100
2024-25 Union D1 ECAC — 29 0 7 7 0.241
2023-24 Michigan D1 BigTen — 6 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Michigan D1 BigTen — 5 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10774
Defenseman overall
#2017
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hunter Svicki
Canton · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Stefan Seel
Concordia · 2014-15
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryce Howard
SUNY Geneseo · 2023-24
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.