IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Steve Mason Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-01-13 Country: Netherlands
2006 · Round 3, Pick #69  ·  Columbus Blue Jackets Columbus Blue Jackets
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Krefelder EV 1981 U18 DNL 32 9 10 19 0.594 0.0917 0.0867 0.3812 0.3605
2007-08 Nipawin Hawks SJHL 58 23 22 45 0.776 0.1988 0.1925 0.5849 0.5663
2008-09 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 60 22 22 44 0.733 0.2825 0.2571 1.0672 0.9714
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Miami D1 CCHA-orig SR 10 0 1 1 0.100
2011-12 Miami D1 CCHA-orig JR 7 0 1 1 0.143
2010-11 Miami D1 CCHA-orig SO 24 1 1 2 0.083
2009-10 Miami D1 NCHC FR 7 1 2 3 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2009-10 · Miami
+116.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#25428
Forward overall
#878
Forward born in 1988

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Kroska
St. Olaf · 2013-14
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cam Bergeman
University of New England · 2023-24
0.783 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Frankie DeAugustine
UMass Boston · 2011-12
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.