IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Parker Lindauer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-05-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Janesville Jets NAHL 8 2 4 6 0.750 0.2756 0.3012 0.7916 0.8651
2019-20 Janesville Jets NAHL 32 14 17 31 0.969 0.3559 0.3559 1.0226 1.0226
2020-21 Tri-City Storm USHL 35 3 4 7 0.200 0.1180 0.1180 0.6007 0.6007
2021-22 — USHL 52 5 7 12 0.231 0.1361 0.1231 0.6932 0.6268
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Union D1 ECAC SR 37 10 24 34 0.919
2024-25 Union D1 ECAC — 34 3 11 14 0.412
2023-24 Maine D1 HockeyEast — 16 1 1 2 0.125
2022-23 Maine D1 HockeyEast — 15 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29600
Forward overall
#1555
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mathieu MacMillan
Utica · 2024-25
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Brenk
Augsburg · 2014-15
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Klatt
Fitchburg State · 2017-18
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.