IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Will Campion Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-03-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 New York Bobcats EHL 43 8 23 31 0.721 0.1665 0.1720 0.3527 0.3644
2014-15 Langley Rivermen BCHL 51 4 26 30 0.588 0.2266 0.2200 0.8560 0.8312
2015-16 Langley Rivermen BCHL 52 7 23 30 0.577 0.2223 0.2040 0.8396 0.7703
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Geneseo D1 — JR 24 3 10 13 0.542
2018-19 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC JR 24 3 10 13 0.542
2017-18 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC SO 10 0 4 4 0.400
2016-17 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC FR 1 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#5587
Defenseman overall
#957
Defenseman born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Robert Clerc
SUNY Potsdam · 2017-18
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mason Kesselring
Curry · 2024-25
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Rooney
Roger Williams · 2024-25
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.