IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Perron Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-09-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 52 6 4 10 0.192 0.0748 0.0779 0.2804 0.2919
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Nichols D3 CNE SR 23 1 8 9 0.391
2020-21 Nichols D3 CNE JR 4 1 3 4 1.000
2019-20 Nichols D3 CNE SO 26 13 12 25 0.962
2018-19 Nichols D3 CNE FR 23 8 10 18 0.783
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.78
2018-19 · Nichols
+1073.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#44790
Forward overall
#2123
Forward born in 1998
#3367
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Kyle Haak
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Air Force (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mitch Maloney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brady Ferguson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Heller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor May
Adrian · 2017-18
0.783 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Gamache
Hobart · 2009-10
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Max Routledge
Canton · 2015-16
0.619 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.